Re: select() efficiency / epoll
From: Davy Durham (pubaddr2_at_davyandbeth.com)
Date: 08/23/05
- Previous message: Ian Kent: "Re: [Samba] Re: New maintainer needed for the Linux smb filesystem"
- In reply to: Davide Libenzi: "Re: select() efficiency / epoll"
- Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: select() efficiency / epoll"
- Reply: Davide Libenzi: "Re: select() efficiency / epoll"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:08:18 -0500 To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> I should mention that the 2.4 patch is old WRT mainline epoll in 2.6
> (I stopped maintaining it when 2.6 went "stable"). I'd definitely
> suggest to use 2.6 if you are looking at epoll.
>
I am using linux-2.6.11 and glibc-2.3.4 .. and using select() in it's
place seems to work fine. Are there any known issues with say, one
thread does epoll_wait()s while other threads may be doing epoll_ctl()s?
Is there someone else I should be asking this question?
Thanks,
Davy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Ian Kent: "Re: [Samba] Re: New maintainer needed for the Linux smb filesystem"
- In reply to: Davide Libenzi: "Re: select() efficiency / epoll"
- Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: select() efficiency / epoll"
- Reply: Davide Libenzi: "Re: select() efficiency / epoll"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|