Re: Initramfs and TMPFS!
From: Chris Wedgwood (cw_at_f00f.org)
Date: 08/26/05
- Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Initramfs and TMPFS!"
- In reply to: Alan Jenkins: "Re: Initramfs and TMPFS!"
- Next in thread: Kent Robotti: "Re: Initramfs and TMPFS!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:08:51 -0700 To: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 08:05:32PM +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> I'm curious as to why the kernel has to include the decoder - why
> you can't just run a self-extracting executable in an empty
> initramfs (with a preset capacity if needs be).
You could do tht right now if you wished.
We just support decompression in the kernel because it's not overly
painful to do so (the code exists and works fairly well for the most
part). The code to do so isn't ver large and it's marked __init too
(well, it should be).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Initramfs and TMPFS!"
- In reply to: Alan Jenkins: "Re: Initramfs and TMPFS!"
- Next in thread: Kent Robotti: "Re: Initramfs and TMPFS!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
