Re: 2.6.12 Performance problems
From: Danial Thom (danial_thom_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/27/05
- Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing."
- In reply to: Vladimir B. Savkin: "Re: 2.6.12 Performance problems"
- Next in thread: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich: "Re: 2.6.12 Performance problems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 07:35:16 -0700 (PDT) To: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@sectorb.msk.ru>
--- "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@sectorb.msk.ru>
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 11:08:43PM -0700,
> Danial Thom wrote:
> > If your test is still set up, try compiling
> > something large while doing the test. The
> drops
> > go through the roof in my tests.
> >
> Couldn't this happen because ksoftirqd by
> default
> has a nice value of 19?
>
> ~
> :wq
> With
> best regards,
>
> Vladimir Savkin.
renicing ksoftirqd improves it a bit, but
still tons of loss, even at only 120Kpps.
Danial
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing."
- In reply to: Vladimir B. Savkin: "Re: 2.6.12 Performance problems"
- Next in thread: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich: "Re: 2.6.12 Performance problems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]