Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Mark SMP on UML/x86_64 as broken
From: Andi Kleen (ak_at_suse.de)
Date: 08/30/05
- Previous message: Stephen Hemminger: "Re: Very strange Marvell/Yukon Gigabit NIC networking problems"
- In reply to: Jeff Dike: "[PATCH 4/9] UML - Mark SMP on UML/x86_64 as broken"
- Next in thread: Jeff Dike: "Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Mark SMP on UML/x86_64 as broken"
- Reply: Jeff Dike: "Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Mark SMP on UML/x86_64 as broken"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Date: 30 Aug 2005 22:42:15 +0200
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> writes:
> Noticed by Al Viro - SMP on x86_64 is fundamentally broken due to
> UML's reuse of the host arch's percpu stuff. This is OK on x86, but
> the x86_64 pda stuff just won't work for UML.
The generic one should work too, it's just less efficient.
So you can probably easily replace them.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Stephen Hemminger: "Re: Very strange Marvell/Yukon Gigabit NIC networking problems"
- In reply to: Jeff Dike: "[PATCH 4/9] UML - Mark SMP on UML/x86_64 as broken"
- Next in thread: Jeff Dike: "Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Mark SMP on UML/x86_64 as broken"
- Reply: Jeff Dike: "Re: [PATCH 4/9] UML - Mark SMP on UML/x86_64 as broken"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]