Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver
From: Mateusz Berezecki (mateuszb_at_gmail.com)
Date: 08/31/05
- Previous message: David William: "INVISTMENT PROJECT"
- In reply to: Florian Weimer: "Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver"
- Next in thread: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:25:12 +0200 To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
-> > the problem with openbsd version of the hal is that it is - sorry to
-> > say that - fundamentally broken, at least it was last time I was
-> > checking.
->
-> It's better than nothing, that is, it worked for us when we gave it a
-> try. And it seems to be relatively unencumbered.
ok, maybe it sounded to harsh. What I really meant was that when I
was doing my research on the atheros chipset I revealed some
differences between what is actually in HAL and what is in openbsd
driver. It could have been due to the update schedule of madwifi. It
is always easier to be up to date with the vendor supported driver
than with reverse engineered one. Anyways what I saw was that some
parts were missing in openbsd. I don't know how much in overall.
Mateusz
-- @..@ Mateusz Berezecki (----) mateuszb@gmail.com http://mateusz.agrest.org ( >__< ) PGP: 5F1C 86DF 89DB BFE9 899E 8CBE EB60 B7A7 43F9 5808 ^^ ~~ ^^
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: David William: "INVISTMENT PROJECT"
- In reply to: Florian Weimer: "Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver"
- Next in thread: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Atheros and rt2x00 driver"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
