Re: [PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL
From: Herbert Xu (herbert_at_gondor.apana.org.au)
Date: 08/31/05
- Previous message: Holger Kiehl: "Re: Where is the performance bottleneck?"
- In reply to: Jesper Juhl: "[PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:57:55 +1000 To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:45:54PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> I've posted similar patches in the past, but was asked to first until the
> short-circuit patch moved from -mm to mainline - and since it is now
> firmly there in 2.6.13 I assume there's no problem there anymore.
> I was also asked previously to make the patch against mainline and not -mm,
> so this patch is against 2.6.13.
Thanks for you work and patience Jesper, this patch looks good to me.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Holger Kiehl: "Re: Where is the performance bottleneck?"
- In reply to: Jesper Juhl: "[PATCH] crypto_free_tfm callers do not need to check for NULL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
