[PATCH 2/2] Use page present for pae pdpes

From: Zachary Amsden (zach_at_vmware.com)
Date: 08/31/05

  • Next message: Zachary Amsden: "[PATCH 0/2] Trivial cleanups to virtualization tree"
    Date:	Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:51:48 -0700
    To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>, Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>, Martin Bligh <mbligh@mbligh.org>, Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap@vmware.com>, Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com>, Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>, Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
    
    

    Ok, the use of "1 + " and subtraction of one for PAE PDPEs has confused
    many people now. Make it explicit what is going on and why anding with
    PAGE_MASK is a better idea to strip these bits.

    Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
    Depends-on: add-pgtable-allocation-notifiers
    Index: linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c
    ===================================================================
    --- linux-2.6.13.orig/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c 2005-08-31 14:48:17.000000000 -0700
    +++ linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/pgtable.c 2005-08-31 14:48:53.000000000 -0700
    @@ -247,14 +247,14 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
                     if (!pmd)
                             goto out_oom;
                     SetPagePDE(virt_to_page(pmd));
    - set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd)));
    + set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(_PAGE_PRESENT | __pa(pmd)));
             }
             return pgd;
     
     out_oom:
             for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
                     ClearPagePDE(pfn_to_page(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT));
    - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1));
    + kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i]) & PAGE_MASK));
             }
             kmem_cache_free(pgd_cache, pgd);
             return NULL;
    @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ void pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
             if (PTRS_PER_PMD > 1)
                     for (i = 0; i < USER_PTRS_PER_PGD; ++i) {
                             ClearPagePDE(pfn_to_page(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT));
    - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1));
    + kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i]) & PAGE_MASK));
                     }
             /* in the non-PAE case, free_pgtables() clears user pgd entries */
             kmem_cache_free(pgd_cache, pgd);
    Index: linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/init.c
    ===================================================================
    --- linux-2.6.13.orig/arch/i386/mm/init.c 2005-08-31 14:48:17.000000000 -0700
    +++ linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/mm/init.c 2005-08-31 14:48:53.000000000 -0700
    @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ void zap_low_mappings (void)
              */
             for (i = 0; i < USER_PTRS_PER_PGD; i++)
     #ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
    - set_pgd(swapper_pg_dir+i, __pgd(1 + __pa(empty_zero_page)));
    + set_pgd(swapper_pg_dir+i, __pgd(_PAGE_PRESENT | __pa(empty_zero_page)));
     #else
                     set_pgd(swapper_pg_dir+i, __pgd(0));
     #endif
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Zachary Amsden: "[PATCH 0/2] Trivial cleanups to virtualization tree"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Stupid question
      ... >I added those in so that they were explicit. ... >They do no harm. ... Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
      ... > the problem is that the pay elsewhere is far more spread out, ... > the cpu ... doing this explicit makes a lot of sense. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission
      ... > agree on the license. ... By submitting a patch to a maintainer, ... is to _document_ it, and make it _explicit_. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH][I2C] Marvell mv64xxx i2c driver
      ... > I can't find any definitive policy on this. ... I kind of like the explicit ... > Attached is a replacement patch. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: ntfs: remove redundant assignments
      ... > the compiler thinks it is the same. ... Let me play the devils advocate here: why do you memset() (now ... There's a simple reason why I don't like explicit assignments: ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)