Re: git tag in localversion
From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea_at_cpushare.com)
Date: 09/13/05
- Previous message: iSteve: "Re: query_modules syscall gone? Any replacement?"
- In reply to: Ryan Anderson: "Re: git tag in localversion"
- Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: git tag in localversion"
- Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: git tag in localversion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:16:18 +0200 To: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:31:27AM -0400, Ryan Anderson wrote:
> My suggestion would be to classify these wherever they would fall if the
> -gXXXXXXXX wasn't present, as they fall into the same category.
I was considering doing this last night.
OTOH if I do that, I should merge the -git(\d+) in the same category
too.
> They won't get as much testing, but if you see 5 or 10 of these in the
> same category and -rc range, that's a good indication that a few people
> are testing those kernels.
Right now I simply moved them from unknown to the mainline branch, but I
still leave them separated like the -git(\d+) tags.
I probably should change that and merge after removing hte -g and -git
tags (of course without discarding the tag but showing it after clicking
on the kernel release).
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: iSteve: "Re: query_modules syscall gone? Any replacement?"
- In reply to: Ryan Anderson: "Re: git tag in localversion"
- Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: git tag in localversion"
- Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: git tag in localversion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
