Re: [Patch] Support UTF-8 scripts
From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa_at_zytor.com)
Date: 09/16/05
- Previous message: linux-os (Dick Johnson): "Re: best way to access device driver functions"
- In reply to: Bodo Eggert: "Re: [Patch] Support UTF-8 scripts"
- Next in thread: Horst von Brand: "Re: [Patch] Support UTF-8 scripts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:25:09 -0700 To: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>
Bodo Eggert wrote:
>
> It should, but as long as old programs are still around, we'll have both
> and need a marker to distinguish them. Otherwise we'll be stuck with
> legacy scripts for a long time.
>
You don't have markers (although they're defined, see ISO 2022) for your
8-bit encodings, and *THEY'RE THE ONES THAT NEED TO BE DISTINGUISHED.*
Flagging UTF-8, especially with the BOM (as opposed to the ISO 2022
signature, <ESC>%G) is pointless in the context, since you still can't
distinguish your arbitrary number of legacy encodings.
Oh, yes, and try to stick ISO 2022 signatures in scripts or whatnot, and
you can see what current software does with a signature standard that
dates back to the 1970's.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: linux-os (Dick Johnson): "Re: best way to access device driver functions"
- In reply to: Bodo Eggert: "Re: [Patch] Support UTF-8 scripts"
- Next in thread: Horst von Brand: "Re: [Patch] Support UTF-8 scripts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
