Re: what's next for the linux kernel?

From: Dave Neuer (mr.fred.smoothie_at_pobox.com)
Date: 10/05/05

  • Next message: Bodo Eggert: "Re: what's next for the linux kernel?"
    Date:	Wed, 5 Oct 2005 16:58:45 -0400
    To: Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>
    
    

    On 10/5/05, Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com> wrote:
    >
    > What you don't get is that if you don't have rights to write to a file
    > then you shouldn't have the right to delete the file. Once you get past
    > the "inside the box" Unix thinking you'll see the logic in this. So what
    > if the process of deleting a file involves writing to it. That's not
    > relevant.
    >

    No. Listen to what other people are saying. If you have the right to
    _create_ the file, you have the right to _delete_ the file. In one
    case you are changing the state of where something is stored --
    leaving your report on a desk. Changing the contents of the report is
    different.

    You may not like this paradigm, but it is the Unix/POSIX paradigm and
    Linux is not going to suddenly ditch it because it doesn't fit the way
    you think permissions should work. As others (and you yourself) have
    pointed out, there are other mechanisms in Linux to build additional
    policy layers above the basic FS semantics. If you care this much
    about the issue, write your own filesystem w/ its own enhanced
    permissions scheme, but stop asking the Linux development community to
    morph its _Unix-like_ operating system into something else and
    insisting everyone who doesn't share your subjective point of view is
    ignorant.

    Dave
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Bodo Eggert: "Re: what's next for the linux kernel?"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog
      ... >table in the system BIOS which the motherboard vendors supply. ... Is it not possible that Linux could be made to handling this hardware ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: 2.7 (future kernel) wish
      ... > I've never seen one give a STOP error from that but I guess a bad driver ... I would like to see the HAL type crap for Linux. ... to have uniform user device control from a gui programmable means. ... To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: 4level page tables for Linux II
      ... >> It's kind of a mess, ... One of the reasons that Linux is so hackable is that ... Perhaps you shouldn't touch kernel code if you can't ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]
      ... Imagine a small charity in a rural town in Bolivia or ... Colorado. ... A local person put Linux on their 200 MHz ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: PROBLEM: Impossible to read files from a CD-Rom
      ... Some drives barf if you try and ... connected to a dell laptop. ... the same laptop package at first, but it should still work (or linux may ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)