Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
From: Andi Kleen (ak_at_suse.de)
Date: 10/06/05
- Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [RFC] atomic create+open"
- In reply to: Harald Welte: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance"
- Next in thread: Patrick McHardy: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance"
- Reply: Patrick McHardy: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 19:59:56 +0200 To: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Henrik Nordstrom <hno@marasystems.com>
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:38:02AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 06:53:31PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 October 2005 19:01, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > > Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > In a sense it's even getting worse: For example us losing the CONFIG
> > > > option to disable local conntrack (Patrick has disabled it some time ago
> > > > without even a comment why he did it) has a really bad impact in some
> > > > cases.
> > >
> > > It was necessary to correctly handle locally generated ICMP errors.
> >
> > Well you most likely wrecked local performance then when it's enabled.
>
> so you would favour a system that incorrectly deals with ICMP errors but
> has higher performance?
I would favour a system where development doesn't lose sight of performance.
Perhaps there would be other ways to fix this problem without impacting
performance unduly? Can you describe it in detail?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [RFC] atomic create+open"
- In reply to: Harald Welte: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance"
- Next in thread: Patrick McHardy: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance"
- Reply: Patrick McHardy: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|