Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?)
From: Andi Kleen (ak_at_suse.de)
Date: 10/11/05
- Previous message: Robert Crocombe: "PS/2 Keyboard under 2.6.x"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?)"
- Next in thread: Joe Seigh: "Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?)"
- Reply: Joe Seigh: "Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 03:20:27 +0200
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 02:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I'm not advocating for changing spinlock implementation, it's just a
> > thought...
>
> It would make sense in these cases if there was some primitive which we
> could call which says "hey, I expect+want another CPU to grab this lock in
> preference to this CPU".
I just don't know how to implement such a primitive given the guarantees
of the x86 architecture. It might be possible to do something that
works on specific CPUs, but that will likely break later.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Robert Crocombe: "PS/2 Keyboard under 2.6.x"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?)"
- Next in thread: Joe Seigh: "Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?)"
- Reply: Joe Seigh: "Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|