Re: [PATCH 1/6] Uml - reuse i386 cpu-specific tuning
From: Andrew Morton (akpm_at_osdl.org)
Date: 10/26/05
- Previous message: Dave Hansen: "Re: [PATCH 3/5] Swap Migration V4: migrate_pages() function"
- In reply to: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso: "[PATCH 1/6] Uml - reuse i386 cpu-specific tuning"
- Next in thread: Blaisorblade: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] Uml - reuse i386 cpu-specific tuning"
- Reply: Blaisorblade: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] Uml - reuse i386 cpu-specific tuning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:22:00 -0700 To: "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
"Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
>
> arch/i386/Kconfig | 304 ------------------------------------------------
> arch/i386/Kconfig.cpu | 305 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Have mercy. I currently have twelve patches which alter arch/i386/Kconfig
and this patch conflicts with most of them. This shouldn't come as a
surprise - Kconfig files are oft-patched, and this is x86.
What I did was to simply copy the large block between
if !X86_ELAN
and
config X86_OOSTORE
over into Kconfig.cpu, taking the modifications with it.
As long as that's also what you did things should work OK. If you actually
made any changes as you did the copy-and-paste, we're screwed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Dave Hansen: "Re: [PATCH 3/5] Swap Migration V4: migrate_pages() function"
- In reply to: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso: "[PATCH 1/6] Uml - reuse i386 cpu-specific tuning"
- Next in thread: Blaisorblade: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] Uml - reuse i386 cpu-specific tuning"
- Reply: Blaisorblade: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] Uml - reuse i386 cpu-specific tuning"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
