Re: An idea on devfs vs. udev
From: Neil Brown (neilb_at_suse.de)
Date: 10/30/05
- Previous message: Neil Brown: "Re: An idea on devfs vs. udev"
- Next in thread: Daniele Orlandi: "Re: An idea on devfs vs. udev"
- Reply: Daniele Orlandi: "Re: An idea on devfs vs. udev"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:35:53 +1100
On Sunday October 30, greg@kroah.com wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 08:07:11PM +0200, Daniele Orlandi wrote:
> >
> > So, why cannot we substitute the "dev" file within /sys with the actual device
> > file?
>
> Please read the archives, this comes up every few months or so.
..thus making it a Frequently Asked Question. However it isn't
answered in the FAQ.
Any chance of writing a little FAQ entry for us and getting it into
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Maybe it could replace entry 9.5:
What's devfs and why is it a Good Idea (tm)?
:-)
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Neil Brown: "Re: An idea on devfs vs. udev"
- Next in thread: Daniele Orlandi: "Re: An idea on devfs vs. udev"
- Reply: Daniele Orlandi: "Re: An idea on devfs vs. udev"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|