Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
From: Paul Jackson (pj_at_sgi.com)
Date: 10/31/05
- Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: What is the history of CONFIG_EXT{2,3}_CHECK?"
- In reply to: Rohit Seth: "Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:28:20 -0800 To: Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>
Rohit wrote:
> Not sure why? Let me see if some new values could better articulate the
> meaning.
See also Nick's comments, before going too far. He was advocating
just using binary flags and adding a gfp_high flag, or something
like that.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: What is the history of CONFIG_EXT{2,3}_CHECK?"
- In reply to: Rohit Seth: "Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|