Re: Would I be violating the GPL?

From: Jeff V. Merkey (jmerkey_at_utah-nac.org)
Date: 11/01/05

  • Next message: Nicolas Mailhot: "pcie_portdrv_probe->Dev has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS (CK804)" 
    Date:	Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:43:14 -0700
To: alex@alexfisher.me.uk

    Alan Cox and others have publicly stated that drivers, if complied stand
    alone with NO DEPENDENCIES ON KERNEL HEADERS (i.e. they do not
    incorporate in any way any kernel headers or source code tagged GPL) do
    not violate the GPL when provided with Linux. DSFS, NVidia, and several
    folks build kernel modules which are stand alone and are not objected to
    by the majority of folks.

    If these drivers include kernel headers as part of the build, then the
    drivers violate the GPL. Period. Check the code. If the vendor is
    including **ANY** GPL kernel headers, then they are required to open
    source the drivers. There are some zealots and GPL bigots that disagree
    with this, but Linux folks seem to be reasonable on this point.

    Jeff

    Alexander Fisher wrote:

    >Hello.
    >
    >A supplier of a PCI mezzanine digital IO card has provided a linux 2.4
    >driver as source code. They have provided this code source with a
    >license stating I won't redistribute it in anyway.
    >My concern is that if I build this code into a module, I won't be able
    >to distribute it to customers without violating either the GPL (by not
    >distributing the source code), or the proprietary source code license
    >as currently imposed by the supplier.
    >>From what I have read, this concern is only valid if the binary module
    >is considered to be a 'derived work' of the kernel. The module source
    >directly includes the following kernel headers :
    >
    >#include <linux/kernel.h>
    >#include <linux/types.h>
    >#include <linux/fs.h>
    >#include <linux/errno.h>
    >#include <linux/wrapper.h>
    >#include <linux/module.h>
    >#include <linux/iobuf.h>
    >#include <linux/highmem.h>
    >#include <asm/uaccess.h>
    >#include <linux/mm.h>
    >#include <asm/unistd.h>
    >
    >Does this make the compiled module a derived work? Are the 'static
    >inlines' from the headers substantial enough?
    >
    >I really want to have a clear understanding of the issues before
    >contacting the supplier. Any advice would be very much appreciated.
    >Kind regards,
    >Alex
    >-
    >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    >
    >
    >

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Nicolas Mailhot: "pcie_portdrv_probe->Dev has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS (CK804)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Developing non-commercial drivers ?
      ... There is an interesting situation that seemingly meets the GPL clause ... kernel drivers for an embedded defence related project. ... 'manufactured' hardware and sells it to their ONLY customer, ... Organization A NOT REVEAL the source code to anybody else and this is ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Would I be violating the GPL?
      ... > incorporate in any way any kernel headers or source code tagged GPL) do ... > not violate the GPL when provided with Linux. ... > folks build kernel modules which are stand alone and are not objected to ... > drivers violate the GPL. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • RE: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?
      ... The GPL gives you the ... Another point worth mentioning is that if the Linux kernel headers are ... themselves would also be pure GPL by extension if the above argument ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: why is debian the only distribution that wont let me run X?
      ... >> installed.To install those you'll need at least the kernel headers for ... isn't listed at nvidia.An email to their support might clear this up for you. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Would I be violating the GPL?
      ... > distributing the source code), or the proprietary source code license ... > as currently imposed by the supplier. ... > directly includes the following kernel headers: ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)