Re: openat()
From: dean gaudet (dean-list-linux-kernel_at_arctic.org)
Date: 11/09/05
- Previous message: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: [PATCH] Incorrect device link for ide-cs"
- In reply to: Ulrich Drepper: "openat()"
- Next in thread: Nicholas Miell: "Re: openat()"
- Reply: Nicholas Miell: "Re: openat()"
- Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: openat()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:42:00 -0800 (PST) To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Can we please get the openat() syscall implemented? I know Linus already
> declared this is a good idea and I can only stress that it is really essential
> for some things. It is today impossible to write correct code which uses long
> pathnames since all these operations would require the use of chdir() which
> affect the whole POSIX process and not just one thread. In addition we have
> the reduction of race conditions.
oh sweet i've always wanted this for perf improvements in multithreaded
programs which have to deal with lots of lookups deep in a directory tree
(especially over NFS).
would this include other related syscalls such as link, unlink, rename,
chown, chmod... so that the the virtualization of the "current working
directory" concept is more complete?
-dean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: [PATCH] Incorrect device link for ide-cs"
- In reply to: Ulrich Drepper: "openat()"
- Next in thread: Nicholas Miell: "Re: openat()"
- Reply: Nicholas Miell: "Re: openat()"
- Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: openat()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|