Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
From: Jörn Engel (joern_at_wohnheim.fh-wedel.de)
Date: 11/17/05
- Previous message: Junichi Uekawa: "Re: [x86_64] 2.6.14-git13 mplayer fails with "v4l2: ioctl queue buffer failed: Bad address" (2 Nov 2005, 11 Nov 2005)"
- In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks"
- Next in thread: Jeffrey V. Merkey: "Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks"
- Reply: Jeffrey V. Merkey: "Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:06:54 +0100 To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
On Wed, 16 November 2005 19:45:08 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Jörn did some analysis regarding possible call paths > 3k.
And most of them have been changed since. Zlib remains high on the
list, but those paths are from /lib/inflate.c, during bootup.
What remains to be analysed is the recursions. If someone seriously
wants to work on those, I can respin the tests. The process is not
fully automated, so it will take me a weekend (and this weekend is
scheduled for a party).
Jörn
-- The cheapest, fastest and most reliable components of a computer system are those that aren't there. -- Gordon Bell, DEC labratories - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Junichi Uekawa: "Re: [x86_64] 2.6.14-git13 mplayer fails with "v4l2: ioctl queue buffer failed: Bad address" (2 Nov 2005, 11 Nov 2005)"
- In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks"
- Next in thread: Jeffrey V. Merkey: "Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks"
- Reply: Jeffrey V. Merkey: "Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
