Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
From: Andi Kleen (ak_at_suse.de)
Date: 11/17/05
- Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks"
- In reply to: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:46:05 +0100: "Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks"
- Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:46:05 +0100" <grundig@teleline.es> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 03:01:00 +0100
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:46, Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:46:05 +0100 wrote:
> El Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:03:34 -0500,
> Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> escribió:
>
> > We could implement a stack guard page for the transition period, so that
>
> CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW doesn't do that but it looks useful too.
>
> Does CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW harm performance a lot? (doesn't
> look like that for a newbie's eye)
No, it's very cheap. In fact it could be probably enabled by default.
-Andi
P.S.: Can you please chose a less irritating realname?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks"
- In reply to: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:46:05 +0100: "Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks"
- Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
