Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup
From: Andrew Morton (akpm_at_osdl.org)
Date: 11/21/05
- Previous message: Jody McIntyre: "Re: [patch 1/3] Add SCM info to MAINTAINERS"
- In reply to: Jesper Juhl: "Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:20:51 -0800 To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So, if we just cleaned up the top 10 offenders we'd get rid of 6281
> out of the total 14491 warnings.
Yes, that's sane - it'll help make the warning output more manageable. I
think the i386/bitops.h one is fixed in -mm.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jody McIntyre: "Re: [patch 1/3] Add SCM info to MAINTAINERS"
- In reply to: Jesper Juhl: "Re: [PATCH] i386, nmi: signed vs unsigned mixup"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]