Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
From: Andi Kleen (ak_at_suse.de)
Date: 11/23/05
- Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "[2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS"
- In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [patch] SMP alternatives"
- Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [patch] SMP alternatives"
- Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [patch] SMP alternatives"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:32:53 +0100 To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Well, with VTX or Pacifica virtualization is in ring 3. The fact that
Not it's not. The whole point is that there is no "ring compression"
The guest has all its normal rings, just the hypervisor has additional
"negative" rings.
In the current Xen x86-64 para virtualization setup the guest kernel
is in ring 3, but I hope VT/P. will do away with that because it
causes lots of issues.
> What you really want is one bit for kernel mode (cpl 0-2) and one for
> user mode (cpl 3).
Yes.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "[2.6 patch] add -Werror-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAGS"
- In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [patch] SMP alternatives"
- Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [patch] SMP alternatives"
- Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [patch] SMP alternatives"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|