Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] ioat: DMA subsystem
From: Ingo Oeser (netdev_at_axxeo.de)
Date: 11/24/05
- Previous message: Mark Lord: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: /dev/sr0 not ready, but working"
- In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] ioat: DMA subsystem"
- Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] ioat: DMA subsystem"
- Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] ioat: DMA subsystem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:00:50 +0100
Hi,
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> explanation of this function would be nice. remember to answer "how?"
> and "why?", not "what?".
Wasn't it the other way around?
Citing linux/Documentation/CodingStyle, section 7 "Comments":
"Generally, you want your comments to tell WHAT your code does, not HOW."
HOW and WHY should be obvious by the source code, unless
the sources are a mess.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Mark Lord: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: /dev/sr0 not ready, but working"
- In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] ioat: DMA subsystem"
- Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] ioat: DMA subsystem"
- Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] ioat: DMA subsystem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|