Re: [PATCH & RFC] kdump and stack overflows
From: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao (fernando_at_intellilink.co.jp)
Date: 11/29/05
- Previous message: Ryan Richter: "crash on x86_64 - mm related?"
- In reply to: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [PATCH & RFC] kdump and stack overflows"
- Next in thread: Vivek Goyal: "Re: [Fastboot] Re: [PATCH & RFC] kdump and stack overflows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:43:32 +0900
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 11:29 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@intellilink.co.jp> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 06:39 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@intellilink.co.jp> writes:
>
> > Regarding the stack overflow audit of the nmi path, we have the problem
> > that both nmi_enter and nmi_exit in do_nmi (see code below) make heavy
> > use of "current" indirectly (specially through the kernel preemption
> > code).
>
> Ok. I wonder if it would be saner to simply replace the nmi trap
> handler on the crash dump path?
That seems to be the cleanest way to solve the problem. I will write a
patch implementing that and see how it works.
> >> I believe we have a separate interrupt stack that
> >> should help but..
> > Yes, when using 4K stacks we have a separate interrupt stack that should
> > help, but I am afraid that crash dumping is about being paranoid.
>
> Oh I agree. If we had a private 4K stack for the nmi handler we
> would not need to worry about overflow in that case. (baring
> nmi happening during nmis) Hmm. Is there anything to keep
> us doing something bad in that case?
I think that is a sensible thing to do. I am just back from a day
off, but tomorrow I will take a closer look at this.
Regards,
Fernando
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Ryan Richter: "crash on x86_64 - mm related?"
- In reply to: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [PATCH & RFC] kdump and stack overflows"
- Next in thread: Vivek Goyal: "Re: [Fastboot] Re: [PATCH & RFC] kdump and stack overflows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|