Re: [Fastboot] Re: [PATCH & RFC] kdump and stack overflows
From: Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm_at_xmission.com)
Date: 11/29/05
- Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Linux 2.6.15-rc3"
- In reply to: Vivek Goyal: "Re: [Fastboot] Re: [PATCH & RFC] kdump and stack overflows"
- Next in thread: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao: "Re: [PATCH & RFC] kdump and stack overflows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:46:21 -0700
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:29:29AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> (baring
>> nmi happening during nmis) Hmm. Is there anything to keep
>> us doing something bad in that case?
>>
>> I guess as long as we don't clear the high bit of port 0x70 we
>> should be reasonably safe from the nmi firing multiple times.
>
> Are you referring to port 0x23 for IMCR register.
No. Port 0x70 is the cmos address register. 0x71 the cmos
data register. The high bit of 0x70 if the nmi enable.
Although with local apics generating nmis I would be surprised
if it effective in every case. :)
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Linux 2.6.15-rc3"
- In reply to: Vivek Goyal: "Re: [Fastboot] Re: [PATCH & RFC] kdump and stack overflows"
- Next in thread: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao: "Re: [PATCH & RFC] kdump and stack overflows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]