Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [PNP][RFC] Suspend support for PNP bus.]
From: Andrew Morton (akpm_at_osdl.org)
Date: 11/29/05
- Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.6 patch] dpt_i2o fix for deadlock condition"
- In reply to: Pierre Ossman: "Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [PNP][RFC] Suspend support for PNP bus.]"
- Next in thread: Pierre Ossman: "Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [PNP][RFC] Suspend support for PNP bus.]"
- Reply: Pierre Ossman: "Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [PNP][RFC] Suspend support for PNP bus.]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 12:02:12 -0800 To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Add support for suspending devices connected to the PNP bus. New
> >>callbacks are added for the drivers and the PNP hardware layer is
> >>told to disable the device during the suspend.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >The ALSA guys have gone off and implemented their own version of this, and
> >it's a bit different. I'll need to drop this patch now.
> >
> >Please review http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/git-alsa.patch, sort
> >things out?
> >
> >
>
> That things is huge! Do the ALSA guys perhaps have a patch with just the
> PnP bit in it?
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.6 patch] dpt_i2o fix for deadlock condition"
- In reply to: Pierre Ossman: "Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [PNP][RFC] Suspend support for PNP bus.]"
- Next in thread: Pierre Ossman: "Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [PNP][RFC] Suspend support for PNP bus.]"
- Reply: Pierre Ossman: "Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [PNP][RFC] Suspend support for PNP bus.]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|