Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
From: Lee Revell (rlrevell_at_joe-job.com)
Date: 11/29/05
- Previous message: Mateusz Berezecki: "NIC irq nobody cared ? virtual to physical and DMA questions"
- In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]"
- Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]"
- Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:35:39 -0500
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 20:53 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> We're mostly addressing it - there are problems left, but
> overall it's looking good. The remaining problem is
> an education issue of users to not use RDTSC directly,
> but use gettimeofday/clock_gettime
No the issue is to make gettimeofday fast enough that the people who
currently have to use the TSC can use it. Right now it's 1500-3000 nsec
or so, Vojtech mentioned that he has a patch that could reduce that to
150-300 nsec.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Mateusz Berezecki: "NIC irq nobody cared ? virtual to physical and DMA questions"
- In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]"
- Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]"
- Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|