Re: NFS oops on 2.6.14.2

From: Ryan Richter (ryan_at_tau.solarneutrino.net)
Date: 11/29/05

  • Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] add boot option to control Intel combined mode behavior (to allow DMA in combined mode configs!)" 
    Date:	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:54:35 -0500
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>

    On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 04:26:37PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
    > Both presumably following a server reboot?
    >
    > Do you have any sure-fire way to reproduce it?

    Correct. The server crashed and rebooted this morning but I didn't see
    anything like this (these happened a few days ago after another
    mysterious server reboot). I'll be rebooting the server again tonight,
    so we'll see. So no, I don't yet have a sure-fire way to reproduce.

    > > These machines have an NFS-mounted root, but this is mounted nolock so I'm
    > > assuming that's unrelated. The other NFS mounts have options like:
    > >
    > > rw,nosuid,nodev,v3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,intr,udp,lock
    > >
    > > I've also been seeing lots of the "do_vfs_lock: VFS is out of sync with lock
    > > manager!", but that has been happening at least since 2.6.13.
    >
    > That is usually the result of doing kill -9/kill -TERM/kill -INT on a
    > process that was in the act of grabbing a lock.

    OK, well it doesn't seem to cause any problems so I guess I'll ignore
    it. Just wanted to mention it since it sounds kind of ominous.

    Thanks,
    -ryan
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] add boot option to control Intel combined mode behavior (to allow DMA in combined mode configs!)"