printk levels for spinlock debug.

From: Dave Jones (davej_at_redhat.com)
Date: 11/30/05

  • Next message: Benjamin LaHaise: "[PATCH 7/9] x86-64 move thread_info into task_struct" 
    Date:	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:23:30 -0500
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

    Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

    --- vanilla/lib/spinlock_debug.c~ 2005-11-29 23:21:14.000000000 -0500
    +++ vanilla/lib/spinlock_debug.c 2005-11-29 23:21:49.000000000 -0500
    @@ -19,9 +19,9 @@ static void spin_bug(spinlock_t *lock, c
             if (xchg(&print_once, 0)) {
                     if (lock->owner && lock->owner != SPINLOCK_OWNER_INIT)
                             owner = lock->owner;
    - printk("BUG: spinlock %s on CPU#%d, %s/%d\n",
    + printk(KERN_EMERG "BUG: spinlock %s on CPU#%d, %s/%d\n",
                             msg, smp_processor_id(), current->comm, current->pid);
    - printk(" lock: %p, .magic: %08x, .owner: %s/%d, .owner_cpu: %d\n",
    + printk(KERN_EMERG " lock: %p, .magic: %08x, .owner: %s/%d, .owner_cpu: %d\n",
                             lock, lock->magic,
                             owner ? owner->comm : "<none>",
                             owner ? owner->pid : -1,
    @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static void __spin_lock_debug(spinlock_t
                     /* lockup suspected: */
                     if (print_once) {
                             print_once = 0;
    - printk("BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#%d, %s/%d, %p\n",
    + printk(KERN_EMERG "BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#%d, %s/%d, %p\n",
                                     smp_processor_id(), current->comm, current->pid,
                                             lock);
                             dump_stack();
    @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static void rwlock_bug(rwlock_t *lock, c
             static long print_once = 1;
     
             if (xchg(&print_once, 0)) {
    - printk("BUG: rwlock %s on CPU#%d, %s/%d, %p\n", msg,
    + printk(KERN_EMERG "BUG: rwlock %s on CPU#%d, %s/%d, %p\n", msg,
                             smp_processor_id(), current->comm, current->pid, lock);
                     dump_stack();
     #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
    @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static void __read_lock_debug(rwlock_t *
                     /* lockup suspected: */
                     if (print_once) {
                             print_once = 0;
    - printk("BUG: read-lock lockup on CPU#%d, %s/%d, %p\n",
    + printk(KERN_EMERG "BUG: read-lock lockup on CPU#%d, %s/%d, %p\n",
                                     smp_processor_id(), current->comm, current->pid,
                                             lock);
                             dump_stack();
    @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static void __write_lock_debug(rwlock_t
                     /* lockup suspected: */
                     if (print_once) {
                             print_once = 0;
    - printk("BUG: write-lock lockup on CPU#%d, %s/%d, %p\n",
    + printk(KERN_EMERG "BUG: write-lock lockup on CPU#%d, %s/%d, %p\n",
                                     smp_processor_id(), current->comm, current->pid,
                                             lock);
                             dump_stack();
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Benjamin LaHaise: "[PATCH 7/9] x86-64 move thread_info into task_struct"

    Relevant Pages