Re: [PATCH 0/9] x86-64 put current in r10

From: Jari Ruusu (jariruusu_at_users.sourceforge.net)
Date: 11/30/05

  • Next message: Hugh Dickins: "Re: [PATCH] shrinks dentry struct" 
    Date:	Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:39:01 +0200
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>

    Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
    > The following emails contain the patches to convert x86-64 to store current
    > in r10 (also at http://www.kvack.org/~bcrl/patches/v2.6.15-rc3/).
    [snip]
    > No benchmarks that I am aware of show regressions with this change.

    Ben,
    Your patch breaks all out-of-tree amd64 assembler code used in kernel. r10
    register is one of those registers that does not need to be preserved across
    function calls, and reserving that register for other purpose means that all
    assembler code using r10 in kernel must be rewritten. This is deeply
    unfunny.

    Andi,
    Please don't apply Ben's patch. It is already bad enough having to deal with
    two incompatible calling conventions on 32 bit x86. 

    -- 
Jari Ruusu  1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9  DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
  • Next message: Hugh Dickins: "Re: [PATCH] shrinks dentry struct"