Re: [PATCH 0/9] x86-64 put current in r10
From: Andi Kleen (ak_at_suse.de)
Date: 11/30/05
- Previous message: Russell King: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Adding ctrl-o sysrq hack support to 8250 driver"
- In reply to: Benjamin LaHaise: "[PATCH 0/9] x86-64 put current in r10"
- Next in thread: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH 0/9] x86-64 put current in r10"
- Reply: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH 0/9] x86-64 put current in r10"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:02:16 +0100 To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:21:18PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> Hello Andi,
>
> The following emails contain the patches to convert x86-64 to store current
> in r10 (also at http://www.kvack.org/~bcrl/patches/v2.6.15-rc3/). This
> provides a significant amount of code savings (~43KB) over the current
> use of the per cpu data area. I also tested using r15, but that generated
> code that was larger than that generated with r10. This code seems to be
> working well for me now (it stands up to 32 and 64 bit processes and ptrace
> users) and would be a good candidate for further exposure.
Looks good thanks. It will need longer testing though.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Russell King: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Adding ctrl-o sysrq hack support to 8250 driver"
- In reply to: Benjamin LaHaise: "[PATCH 0/9] x86-64 put current in r10"
- Next in thread: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH 0/9] x86-64 put current in r10"
- Reply: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH 0/9] x86-64 put current in r10"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
