Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:07:49 +0000
On Mer, 2005-12-07 at 15:46 -0600, Chase Venters wrote:
> bad things to allowing their competitor to take a *big* lead. Hell,
> wasn't 3dfx's fall from power partially related to IP suits? Or
> did I just hear that somewhere? I don't recall.
If my memory still works correctly 3Dfx sued Nvidia and in the end
Nvidia had to buy them to solve it. Patents are a big issue in the 3D
graphics space and the 'what they can't see' approach to minimising
lawsuits has its obvious appeal.
One of the problems in this area is the big fight going on and the fact
it is not commodity. Ten random developers are not going to produce a
driver comparable to Nvidia's libGL in the same way that ten random
developers can produce as good an ATA or SCSI adapter as anyone else
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Jon Smirl
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- References:
- Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Jon Smirl
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Chase Venters
- Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics
- Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][Patch 3/5] Per-task delay accounting: Sync block I/O delays
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- Next by thread: Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- Index(es):