Re[2]: 2.6.15-rc5-mm2 :-)
- From: Maciej Soltysiak <solt2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:14:10 +0100
Hello Con,
Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 6:52:09 AM, you wrote:
> I missed this announcement (been on leave for a while). This SCHED_BATCH
> implementation is by Ingo and it it is not "idle" scheduling as I have
> implemented in the staircase scheduler. This is just to restrict a task to
> not having any interactive bonus at any stage and to have predictable
> scheduling behaviour I guess.
Thanks a lot. That's good anyway.
If I understand correctly, if Ingo's version gets merged with linus' tree
your implementions of SCHED_BATCH in -ck will be replacing the one from Ingo.
A silly question. Is SCHED_BATCH-kind-of-thing a standard in Unices or general
operating system engineering know-how? Or is this concept only available for
Linux?
--
Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/9] unshare system call (take 3)
- Previous by thread: 2.6.15-rc5-mm2 does not boot on AMD64 with sata_sil
- Next by thread: [2.6.15-rc5-git3] hpet.c causes FC4 GCC 4.0.2 to bomb with unrecognizable insn
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
