Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:56:38 -0800
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:12:01PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> >Now the real question: If one were to have an operating system, and
> >set up a layer that simulated the API of Linux, such that Linux
> >binary modules could be loaded, is _that_ a violation of the GPL?
> No , it is not. It's called "reverse engineering".
That's entirely debatable and I would recommend the original poster
seek legal advice on this as there are many people who will claim
loading GPLd modules is paramount to linking and therefore this is a
violation.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Diego Calleja
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- References:
- blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Robert W. Fuller
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Kyle Moffett
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Steven Rostedt
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Jeff V. Merkey
- blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Prev by Date: 2.6.15-rc5-rt4: BUG: swapper:0 task might have lost a preemption check!
- Next by Date: Re: remove incorrect dependancy on CONFIG_APM
- Previous by thread: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Next by thread: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|