Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Diego Calleja <diegocg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:15:22 +0100
El Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:56:38 -0800,
Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> escribió:
> That's entirely debatable and I would recommend the original poster
> seek legal advice on this as there are many people who will claim
> loading GPLd modules is paramount to linking and therefore this is a
> violation.
So, a GPL application running on top of a BSD-licensed kernel
(or library) is illegal? I doubt it...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Chris Wedgwood
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- References:
- blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Robert W. Fuller
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Kyle Moffett
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Steven Rostedt
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Chris Wedgwood
- blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Prev by Date: Re: remove incorrect dependancy on CONFIG_APM
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-rt4: BUG: swapper:0 task might have lost a preemption check!
- Previous by thread: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Next by thread: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|