Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:28:09 -0800
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 04:15:22AM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> So, a GPL application running on top of a BSD-licensed kernel
> (or library) is illegal? I doubt it...
applications don't link with the kernel, modules do
i don't know if that makes modules legal or not, but it's certainly
not clear cut
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Steven Rostedt
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- References:
- blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Robert W. Fuller
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Kyle Moffett
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Steven Rostedt
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Chris Wedgwood
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Diego Calleja
- blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-rt4: BUG: swapper:0 task might have lost a preemption check!
- Next by Date: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Previous by thread: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Next by thread: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Index(es):