Re: [stable] Re: Linux 2.6.14.5
- From: Grant Coady <grant_lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:28:02 +1100
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:46:23 -0800, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 02:06:03PM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:53:27 -0800, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.14.5 kernel.
>> >
>> >The diffstat and short summary of the fixes are below.
>> >
>> >I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch between
>> >2.6.14.4 and 2.6.14.5, as it is small enough to do so.
>>
>> netfilter is broken compared to 2.6.15-rc7 (first 2.6 kernel tested
>> on this box) or 2.4.32 :( Same ruleset as used for months.
>
>Is it broken compared to 2.6.14.4 and/or 2.6.14? Care to figure out
>which release broke it?
2.6.14.4 -> 2.6.14.5 broke it, 2.6.14 also runs okay, some more info
on http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/test/boxen/deltree/ -- dmesg, `grep =
.config`.
This box is the bugsplatter web server, currently running 2.6.14.4.
iptables/netfilter is rejecting constructs containing "state NEW", see:
http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/test/boxen/deltree/iptables-vnL-2.6.14.4-dt
vs
http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/test/boxen/deltree/iptables-vnL-2.6.14.5-dt
some numbers masked with 'zxcv' to protect the guilty :)
Grant.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Linux 2.6.14.5
- From: Greg KH
- Re: Linux 2.6.14.5
- From: Grant Coady
- Re: [stable] Re: Linux 2.6.14.5
- From: Greg KH
- Linux 2.6.14.5
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.14.5
- Next by Date: Re: [WTF?] sys_tas() on m32r
- Previous by thread: Re: [stable] Re: Linux 2.6.14.5
- Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.14.5
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
