Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
- From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:44:07 -0500 (EST)
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Unification of active and inactive per cpu page lists is a requirement
> for CLOCK-Pro, right?
You can approximate the functionality through use of scan
rates. Not quite as accurate as a unified clock, though.
--
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] vm: page-replace and clockpro
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
- From: Marcelo Tosatti
- [PATCH] vm: page-replace and clockpro
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/9] clockpro-nonresident.patch
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
- Next by thread: [PATCH 02/14] page-replace-try_pageout.patch
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
