Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case



On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:37:11 +0100
Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> wrote:

> >"./a.out 200 & ./a.out 333"
> >
> > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> > 5607 paolo 15 0 2396 320 252 R 56.1 0.1 0:06.79 a.out
> > 5606 paolo 15 0 2396 324 252 R 38.7 0.1 0:04.55 a.out
> > 1 root 16 0 2556 552 468 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.28 init
>
> Strange. Using the exact same arguments, I do see some odd bouncing up to
> high priorities, but they spend the vast majority of their time down at 25.

You shouldn't use "the same exact numbers", you should try different
args and see if you can reproduce the problem. Or maybe preemption
make some difference... I'll try with PREEMPT enabled and see.

--
Paolo Ornati
Linux 2.6.15-rc7-plugsched on x86_64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Leopard bug fix list swells to 130
    ... vast majority are microscopic problems that you can't even find after ... It's the exact same thing with Windows. ... know about the vast majority of problems that are fixed with updates from ... the macShitheads. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Creditors - Final Accounts
    ... are the views of the vast majority ... ... Remind us which ones said that a quotation has to be exact? ...
    (uk.business.accountancy)