Re: PowerPC fastpaths for mutex subsystem
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 14:37:22 -0800
Joel Schopp <jschopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is the second pass at optimizing the fastpath for the new mutex subsystem
> on PowerPC. I think it is ready to be included in the series with the other
> mutex patches now. Tested on a 4 core (2 SMT threads/core) Power5 machine with
> gcc 3.3.2.
>
> Test results from synchro-test.ko:
>
> All tests run for default 5 seconds
> Threads semaphores mutexes mutexes+attached
> 1 63,465,364 58,404,630 62,109,571
> 4 58,424,282 35,541,297 37,820,794
> 8 40,731,668 35,541,297 40,281,768
> 16 38,372,769 37,256,298 41,751,764
> 32 38,406,895 36,933,675 38,731,571
> 64 37,232,017 36,222,480 40,766,379
>
Doens't this mean that the sped-up mutexes are still slower than semaphores?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PowerPC fastpaths for mutex subsystem
- From: Anton Blanchard
- Re: PowerPC fastpaths for mutex subsystem
- References:
- [patch 00/21] mutex subsystem, -V14
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch 00/21] mutex subsystem, -V14
- From: Joel Schopp
- Re: [patch 00/21] mutex subsystem, -V14
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch 00/21] mutex subsystem, -V14
- From: Joel Schopp
- Re: [patch 00/21] mutex subsystem, -V14
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch 00/21] mutex subsystem, -V14
- From: Joel Schopp
- Re: [patch 00/21] mutex subsystem, -V14
- From: Olof Johansson
- PowerPC fastpaths for mutex subsystem
- From: Joel Schopp
- [patch 00/21] mutex subsystem, -V14
- Prev by Date: i2c/ smbus question
- Next by Date: Re: Almost 80% of UDP packets dropped
- Previous by thread: PowerPC fastpaths for mutex subsystem
- Next by thread: Re: PowerPC fastpaths for mutex subsystem
- Index(es):