Re: Almost 80% of UDP packets dropped
- From: be-news06@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Bernd Eckenfels)
- Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 23:35:17 +0100
Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> UDP is connectionless. There is no way for sender to know that it must
> stop sending UDP packets because receiver cannot keep up. If sender
> and your network is producing and delivering UDP packets faster
> than receiver can consume them, packets will be lost.
Yes, but the problem of the OP sounds like the interrupt handling on mips
pretty badly affects the scheduler. I guess softwareinterrupts and network
polling would help here.
Gruss
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Almost 80% of UDP packets dropped
- From: Denis Vlasenko
- Re: Almost 80% of UDP packets dropped
- Prev by Date: [RFC: 2.6 patch] kernel/posix-timers.c: remove do_posix_clock_notimer_create()
- Next by Date: i2c/ smbus question
- Previous by thread: Re: Almost 80% of UDP packets dropped
- Next by thread: Netlink socket problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
