Is Sony violating Linux GPL?



Hi,

A couple of months ago I bought a Sony Vaio VGN-TX50B. It comes with an
embedded version of Linux used to run a multimedia player (InterVideo
InstantON) without booting the main OS.

A booklet containing a copy of the GPL and other free licenses was
included on the laptop package. A note on the same booklet pointed to
http://www.sony.net/Products/Linux/Download/search.html as the place
were the GPL'ed software could be downloaded.

My laptop has a couple of ports for SD and a MagicGate memories not
supported by Linux, but that are usable from the multimedia player and
so that have to be supported by the custom kernel included on the
laptop. I downloaded the kernel package available from the Sony website
expecting to found the source code for the drivers there, but after
closer examination, I found it was an unmodified copy of the Linux sources.

Then I started mailing Vaio technical support (support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx),
asking for the drivers source code, and after several mails they just
refused to give me the drivers source code because "These drivers are
directly delivered to us by the manufacturers of the hardware and
modified by us and therefore we are not obliged to supply any source
code for these drivers".

I am not an expert on Linux internals but I doubt a driver for this kind
of device could be developed independently enough of the kernel to not
be considered a derived work, so is Sony violating the Linux license?


lspci -v

0000:06:05.3 Mass storage controller: Texas Instruments PCIxx21
Integrated FlashMedia Controller
Subsystem: Sony Corporation: Unknown device 81e2
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 57, IRQ 10
Memory at b0104000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2


Cheers,

- Salvador

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Best Linux version to port from OpenServer 5.0.5/6
    ... The drivers for the new version had drivers ... Generally so - it's the kernel flavours that you'll find most worrying. ... source code for device drivers. ... The only time Linux wouldn't boot. ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)
  • Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
    ... Our source code is meaningless to the Open ... Source community at large. ... We are only _using_ Linux. ... Sure we could make our drivers open-source. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Demise of the COM port?
    ... The people who use Linux, BSD, or other free OSs are _not_ ... > Linux that their source code will end up on the internet. ... If they're not selling the drivers, ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Demise of the COM port?
    ... For every person who is prepared to spend money ... >> Linux that their source code will end up on the internet. ... If they're not selling the drivers, ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Can this loop be made faster ?
    ... BUT, as "compensation", nVidia do make the effort to support Linux by ... providing "binary only" drivers...the drivers are "closed source", ... registers and starts executing at ring 0...basically, ... > also need a hw able to do pixel shading. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)