Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
- From: David Nicol <davidnicol@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:29:04 -0600
On 1/9/06, Yaroslav Rastrigin <yarick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Unfortunately, bounties doesn't work :-/
No? Bounties seems to work fine for Asterisk. Is the problem, still no central
linux kernel bounty system?
--
David L Nicol
high on complexity
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
- From: Boxer Gnome
- Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
- From: Yaroslav Rastrigin
- Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
- From: CaT
- Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
- From: Yaroslav Rastrigin
- Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] [BUG]kallsyms_lookup_name should return the text addres
- Next by Date: Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench
- Previous by thread: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
- Next by thread: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
