Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:10:54 +0100 (MET)
> NFS is still twice as slow as FTP, but best with a r/w size of 8192.
Screams for a kftpd ;)
Jan Engelhardt
--
| Alphagate Systems, http://alphagate.hopto.org/
| jengelh's site, http://jengelh.hopto.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Phil Oester
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz
- Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.15-current] i386: multi-column stack backtraces
- Next by Date: Re: io performance...
- Previous by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Next by thread: [patch] mm: Convert global dirty_exceeded flag to per-node node_dirty_exceeded
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|