Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:28:59 +0100
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 01:22:23PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 18:46 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > 3. no ALSA drivers for the same hardware
> >
> > SOUND_SB
>
> ALSA certainly does support "100% Sound Blaster compatibles (SB16/32/64,
> ESS, Jazz16)", it would be a joke if it didn't...
That's not the problem, I should have added an explanation:
SOUND_SB (due to SOUND_KAHLUA and SOUND_PAS)
> Lee
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- From: Lee Revell
- Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- From: Lee Revell
- Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- References:
- RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- From: Lee Revell
- RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: ipath ioctls and their replacements
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|