Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:52:27 +0100
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Let's do the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver in 2.6.17.
> >
>
> heh. I was just thinking that I hadn't heard from Badari and Ken in a while.
>
> I doubt if this'll fly. We're stuck with it.
One thing we can do is ask the distributions to stop shipping raw first,
to see what the fallout is (and to give it as a sign that it's an
obsolete interface). Then a year or two after that....
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Dave Jones
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- References:
- [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Andrew Morton
- [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 6/6] vfs: extend IS_RDONLY() checks to MNT_IS_RDONLY()
- Next by Date: Re: [Alsa-devel] RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Previous by thread: [OT] Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
