Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:35:03 -0800
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> another thing we really should do is making such "obsolete to be phased
> out" things printk (at least once per boot ;) so that people see it in
> their logs, not just in the kernel source.
Like sys_bdflush() has been doing for 3-4 years. That still comes out on
a few of my test boxes, but I'm a distro recidivist.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Jesper Juhl
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- References:
- [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Dave Jones
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- From: Arjan van de Ven
- [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm2
- Next by Date: [PATCH] DocBook: allow even longer return types
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
