Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h
- From: Grant Grundler <iod00d@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:59:07 -0800
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 08:02:50PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> I've not really looked at the rest because I haven't figured out which
> bits will be used on ARM and which won't - which I think is another
> problem with this patch set. I'll look again later tonight.
Russell,
I have the same problem. This file is 920 lines long and contains
7 distinct changes according to the (well written) notes.
Akinobu,
I appreciate your work - but could this particular peice be
split up into 7 chunks?
That would make checking the behavior of something like
HAVE_ARCH_FFZ_BITOPS easier for each arch.
thanks,
grant
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h
- From: Akinobu Mita
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h
- References:
- [PATCH 0/6] RFC: use include/asm-generic/bitops.h
- From: Akinobu Mita
- [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h
- From: Akinobu Mita
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h
- From: Russell King
- [PATCH 0/6] RFC: use include/asm-generic/bitops.h
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm3 / netfilter / firehol problems?
- Next by Date: Re: pppd oopses current linu's git tree on disconnect
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|