Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 21:30:17 +0100
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 11:50:43AM -0800, David Schwartz wrote:
> Correct. However, all the GPL-based ones grant rights *automatically* upon
> distribution.
Of course not. The license only applies if you accept it, and you
don't have to. It's not an EULA.
OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: David Schwartz
- RE: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- References:
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: Olivier Galibert
- RE: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- From: David Schwartz
- Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- Prev by Date: Re: How to map high memory for block io
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.14 kernels and above copy_to_user stupidity with IRQ disabled check
- Previous by thread: RE: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- Next by thread: RE: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading