Re: [patch 0/6] 2.6.14.7 -stable review

Chuck Wolber <chuckw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I don't know if there is a problem, but it goes against the concept of
> "one-off" fixes that aren't maintained

If they have time for this then great, I can't see any drawbacks.
The early concept was just meant to limit the workload.

> (aka the purpose of the -stable
> team). This slope eventually leads us to backporting -stable fixes from
> other -stable releases etc etc.

As long as they can contribute their time it's a win.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/