Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:06:40 +1100
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:24:32PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> just to make sure - is the trace below a safe use of sk_dst_lock too?
> Here sk_dst_lock seems to be taken in real softirq context.
You're right this does look suspicious. Let me take a closer look...
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [lock validator] net/ipv4/fib_hash.c: illegal {enabled-softirqs} -> {used-in-softirq} usage?
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [lock validator] net/ipv4/fib_hash.c: illegal {enabled-softirqs} -> {used-in-softirq} usage?
- From: Herbert Xu
- [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Herbert Xu
- Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- From: Ingo Molnar
- [lock validator] net/ipv4/fib_hash.c: illegal {enabled-softirqs} -> {used-in-softirq} usage?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/11] LED: Add IDE disk activity LED trigger
- Next by Date: r8169 driver - no net connection and hang at shutdown
- Previous by thread: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
- Next by thread: SuSE 10.0 - agpgart: unable to determine aperture size
- Index(es):